header image
Home arrow Lies My Media Told Me
sing.jpg

Responding to duplicity in the media

Filter     Order     Display # 
 Date Item Title Hits
Sep 16, 2018 at 03:24 PM A new authoritarian axis demands an international progressive front 327
Mar 27, 2018 at 12:00 AM Facebook labels Palestinian journalism “hate speech” 247
Jan 16, 2018 at 12:00 AM Apple censors Vic Mensa's views on Palestine 387
Sep 12, 2016 at 12:00 AM Facebook Is Collaborating With the Israeli Government to Determine What Should Be Censored 1221
Feb 04, 2016 at 10:30 PM UNJPPI: Palestine/Israel Media Watch 1469
Jul 03, 2007 at 02:22 PM A Declaration of Independence from Israel 5131
Feb 23, 2006 at 12:00 AM Editorial Delusions at the Globe and Mail - Hamas and the Missing Video 8044
Feb 01, 2006 at 12:00 AM Lost In Translation on CTV 8386
May 04, 2003 at 12:00 AM Our humanity in the balance 5302
 
<< Start < Previous 1 Next > End >>
Results 1 - 9 of 9
In Rachel Corrie verdict, Israel deals new blow to international law
The verdict on the 2003 killing of Rachel Corrie absolved Israel of any wrongdoing, essentially blaming the victim for her death. The trial revealed Israel’s approach to the most fundamental principles of international law, and especially to the duty to protect non-combatants.

By Jeff Halper

For those who hoped for a just verdict on the death of Rachel Corrie, the American student and ISM activist killed by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza in 2003 as she was defending a Palestinian home about to be demolished, this is a sad day. Not surprising, but still sad and bitter. The judge who decided the case, Oded Gershon, absolved the army of all blame, despite massive and internally contradictory testimony to the contrary. Moreover, he essentially blamed Rachel for her own death, commenting that a “normal person” would have run away from the bulldozer rather than confront it.

Palestinians and Israel human rights activists have learned that justice cannot be obtained through the Israeli judicial system. The Haifa District Court, in which the trial was held, could not have ruled other than how the state wanted. For the past 45 years of Israeli occupation, the Supreme Court has excluded from its rulings all reference to international humanitarian law and to the Fourth Geneva Convention in particular, which protects civilians living in conflict situations and under occupation. Only Israeli law applies in the Occupied Palestinian Territories – military law and orders – and the courts have restricted even that form of law by declaring that in instances of “security,” they defer to the military. As in Rachel’s case, the IDF thus has carte blanche to commit war crimes with impunity, with no fear of accountability or punishment.

Read full article...

 

Who's Online
We have 23 guests online