header image
Home arrow Israeli Apartheid Structures
Israeli Apartheid Structures
Is Israel preparing to annex most of West Bank? PDF Print E-mail
Jul 18, 2012 at 12:00 AM

Jonathan Cook
The Electronic Intifada
Nazareth
18 July 2012

The recently published report by an Israeli judge concluding that Israel is not in fact occupying the West Bank — despite a well-established international consensus to the contrary — has provoked mostly incredulity or mirth in Israel and abroad.

Leftwing websites in Israel used comically captioned photographs to highlight Justice Edmond Levy’s preposterous finding. One shows an Israeli soldier pressing the barrel of a rifle to the forehead of a Palestinian pinned to the ground, saying: “You see — I told you there’s no occupation.”

Even Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, seemed a little discomfited by the coverage. He was handed the report more than a fortnight earlier but was apparently reluctant to make it public.

Downplaying the Levy report’s significance may prove unwise, however. If Netanyahu is embarrassed, it is only because of the timing of the report’s publication rather than its substance.

Read full article...

 

In support of Israel Apartheid Week PDF Print E-mail
Mar 11, 2011 at 02:48 PM
By Sid Shniad
Independent Jewish Voices Canada
Paul Tetrault
Canada Palestine Support Network

Independent Jewish Voices (IJV) and the Canada Palestine Support Network (CanPalNet) are proud to endorse Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) activities across the country in defence of Palestinian human rights. We are declaring this in the face of knee-jerk denunciations of these campus-based events.

Read more...
The Russell Tribunal on Palestine PDF Print E-mail
Jan 17, 2011 at 04:51 PM

Russell Tribunal on Palestine

The Russell Tribunal on Palestine (RToP) is an International People’s Tribunal created by a large group of citizens involved in the promotion of peace and justice in the Middle East. These past years, following, inter alia: the international community’s failure to implement the International Court of Justice’s 2004 Advisory Opinion on the construction of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory ; the lack of implementation of the resolution ES-10/15 confirming the ICJ Opinion, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 20 July 2004 ; and the Israeli offensive on Gaza in December 2008 – January 2009, committees have been created in different countries to promote and sustain a citizen’s initiative in support of the rights of the Palestinian people, with public international law as a legal frame of reference.

Read more...
Supporting the Refugees’ right of return is saying NO to Israeli racism PDF Print E-mail
Jan 17, 2011 at 04:21 PM

Lecture by Ilan Pappe at the Stuttgart Conference

Ilan Pappe at Stuttgart

10 JANUARY 2011 [Lecture was given november 2010]

I begin by thanking all the organizers; I know it took quite a lot of efforts to bring us all together. It is a great achievement, and as Mazin Qumsiyeh and Haidar Eid, mentioned, and Lubna Masarwa, yesterday, you also provided a great opportunity for us to meet and we are very grateful to you for this opportunity to meet you and to meet each other. It is easier because of the Israeli oppression to meet here than to meet in Palestine where we should meet and hopefully one day we will all be there without the need to go to the frozen hills of Stuttgart to create a joint life!

And I think that’s the gist of the Zionist story that it does not allow people to meet normal life and to be normal friends that they need to go through all that hardship in order to fulfill a very elementary human impulse to live together.

Read more...
Winners: Isreali Apartheid video contest PDF Print E-mail
Jan 14, 2011 at 02:44 PM

The Itisapartheid Collective (www.itisapartheid.org ) and Stop the Wall (www.stopthewall.org ) want to announce the winner of the Israeli Apartheid Video Contest. 

  • Expert Panel Prize for $300:   Road Map to Apartheid
  • Palestinian Popular Jury Prize for $300:  Confronting the Wall (there were showings and voting in the West Bank and Gaza)
  • Global Jury Prize for $300:  Ali Wall (from internet voting) Overall Prize $500:  Road Map to Apartheid

You can see the films on our website http://www.itisapartheid.tv. We hope you can
announce the winners on your websites, list serves and on Facebook.

Read more...
Does Israel meet the criteria the UN created to describe apartheid? PDF Print E-mail
Aug 31, 2008 at 12:00 AM

International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid

[This page contains only the Introduction. For the full article, including Procedural History, Documents and Status secions, go here: http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/cspca/cspca.html ]

  By John Dugard  
  Professor of International Law  
  Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Leiden  
________________________________
Chinese  English  Français  Español  

The Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (hereinafter Apartheid Convention) has it roots in the opposition of the United Nations to the discriminatory racial policies of the South African Government – known as apartheid – which lasted from 1948 to 1990. Apartheid was annually condemned by the General Assembly as contrary to Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations from 1952 until 1990; and was regularly condemned by the Security Council after 1960. In 1966, the General Assembly labelled apartheid as a crime against humanity (resolution 2202 A (XXI) of 16 December 1966) and in 1984 the Security Council endorsed this determination (resolution 556 (1984) of 23 October 1984). The Apartheid Convention was the ultimate step in the condemnation of apartheid as it not only declared that apartheid was unlawful because it violated the Charter of the United Nations, but in addition it declared apartheid to be criminal. The Apartheid Convention was adopted by the General Assembly on 30 November 1973, by 91 votes in favour, four against (Portugal, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States) and 26 abstentions. It came into force on 18 July 1976. As of August 2008, it has been ratified by 107 States.

Read more...
Israel Penalizing Nakba Commemoration: One More Step Down the Path of Apartheid PDF Print E-mail
Mar 03, 2010 at 12:00 AM

Badil Resource Center [3 March 2010]

The Israeli parliamentary Law Committee has recently approved a law proposal the (“Nakba bill”) that, if passed by the Knesset, would impose economic sanctions on the organizers of Nakba commemorations. Every year in May, Palestinians and supporters of their right of return commemorate the Nakba of 1948, which marks the single most traumatic and far-reaching event in the long and ongoing process of forced displacement and dispossession of the Palestinian people by the state of Israel. Nakba commemorations are important events in Israel, where some 335,000 Palestinians, citizens of Israel, continue to be denied their right to return to their homes, lands and communities, and are forced to live as internally displaced persons within their own country.

Read more...
<< Start < Previous 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 17 of 41
Dichter cancels U.K. trip over fears of 'war crimes' arrest
By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent
Haaretz.
Dec. 6, 2007

Public Security Minister Avi Dichter canceled a trip to Britain over concerns he would be arrested due to his involvement in the decision to assassinate the head of Hamas' military wing in July 2002.

Fifteen people were killed in the bombing of Salah Shehade's house in Gaza, among them his wife and three children, when Dichter was head of the Shin Bet security service. He is the first minister to have to deal with a possible arrest.

Dichter was invited to take part in a conference by a British research institute on "the day after" Annapolis. He was supposed to give an address on the diplomatic process.
Dichter contacted the Foreign Ministry and sought an opinion on the matter, among other reasons because of previous cases in which complaints were filed in Britain and arrest warrants were issued on suspicion of war crimes by senior officers who served during the second intifada.

The Foreign Ministry wrote Dichter that it did not recommend he visit Britain because of a high probability that an extreme leftist organization there would file a complaint, which might lead to an arrest warrant. The ministry also wrote that because Dichter was not an official guest of the British government, he did not have immunity from arrest.

Read full article...